We have entered the age of fauxductivity: Being busy isn’t enough anymore

In today’s era of remote and hybrid work, where the lines between personal and professional life have blurred beyond recognition, the concept of productivity has evolved. What was once solely measured by the hours logged at a desk, is accounted by something far more intangible—something that looks deceptively like productivity but is, in fact, a highly curated performance: fauxductivity.

The art of looking busy has become a survival tactic—a response to the pressures of a workplace culture that often values appearances over actual impact. But is this façade sustainable or is it merely an illusion waiting to crumble under its own weight? The consequences of this cultural shift are far-reaching, affecting everything from career trajectories to mental health. We spoke to three experts to dive deep into how fauxductivity has crept into our lives, why it persists, and how we can reclaim our focus and authenticity at work.

The remote revolution: a double-edged sword

The transition to remote and hybrid work offers greater flexibility, but it has also shifted the way we define productivity. Vineeta Dwivedi, associate professor in Organization and Leadership Studies at SPJIMR, captures this paradox perfectly when she explains, “The shift to remote and hybrid work has transformed productivity from being equated with hours spent at a desk to being measured by tangible outcomes.”

The absence of physical office set-ups, for most part, has given rise to a new set of challenges. Without the constant oversight of managers, many have resorted to digital surveillance—relying on superficial metrics like hours logged or response times to assess productivity. As Shruti Varma, counseling psychologist and executive coach at Confianza Consulting, notes, “Employees and managers often rely on digital metrics to gauge productivity, which can lead to 'fauxductivity'—this environment can encourage employees to focus on a superficial mindset, without commitment and sincerity towards what they are expected to do.”

In turn, employees, anxious about being perceived as idle, have adapted to the cues from their managers, leading to a paradoxical situation where they prioritise "looking busy" over meaningful, impactful work, as Dwivedi elaborates

The psychology behind the illusion

Fauxductivity isn’t just about the optics; it’s deeply psychological. According to Varma, “Fear of judgment, insecurity about job stability, and the desire for validation are psychological factors that drive employees to prioritise ‘looking busy’ over actual output.”

This fear, particularly in environments with micromanagement, forces employees into survival mode. They don’t have the luxury of time to focus on quality or innovation because they are consumed by the constant pressure to demonstrate busyness. As Varma explains, “When success is measured by superficial indicators, such as the number of tasks completed or hours worked, employees may prioritise low-effort, high-visibility tasks to meet expectations, even if they don’t contribute to organisational goals.”

For many, the fear of judgment can be debilitating. Dwivedi offers a telling example: “Managers who emphasise appearances—such as hours logged or immediate responsiveness—create a culture where employees focus on ‘looking busy’ rather than pursuing meaningful, high-quality work.” In such an environment, it’s easier to play the game than to take risks and pursue innovation. The lack of trust and the focus on metrics that reward visibility over substance perpetuate a vicious cycle of fauxductivity.

The cost of fauxductivity: career growth and mental health

At first glance, fauxductivity might seem like an effective coping mechanism—a way to survive the demands of a competitive and increasingly digital workplace. But its long-term effects can be damaging, both for individual careers and mental well-being.

Varma warns, “Fauxductivity may offer short-term gains but leads to long-term frustration and career downturn. Career growth is stunted when individuals become focused on maintaining an illusion of busyness rather than cultivating creativity and skill development.” This is particularly true in industries where innovation and out-of-the-box thinking are prized. When employees invest more energy in appearing productive than in producing high-quality work, they inadvertently block their own career progression.

The psychological toll is equally profound. Dwivedi highlights, “Maintaining a facade of busyness not only hampers personal growth but also leads to burnout, stress, and a sense of dissatisfaction.” As Varma adds, “Ultimately, this undermines both personal and professional growth, creating a cycle of diminishing returns.”

When employees focus on survival rather than self-improvement, they risk becoming trapped in a cycle of mediocrity, where their contributions are limited to the bare minimum. This constant tension between one’s potential and their actual output erodes self-confidence and fosters feelings of inadequacy.

 

The role of leadership and workplace culture

Workplace culture is a critical factor in either perpetuating or dismantling the culture of fauxductivity. Dwivedi emphasises that organisations which reward “busyness” over meaningful output are inadvertently fostering this behaviour. “Workplaces that reward long hours and constant activity—regardless of its impact—perpetuate fauxductivity,” she explains.

To counteract this, Dwivedi advocates for a fundamental shift in how productivity is evaluated. “Organisations should focus on outcome-based metrics rather than activity-based ones, emphasising results and long-term impact. By creating a culture that values quality over quantity, employees will be empowered to focus on meaningful work.”

Managers have a pivotal role to play in this transition. As Varma aptly puts it, “Ninety per cent of an employee's performance is shaped by the role the manager plays.” Managers who cultivate trust, offer clear goals, and support autonomy create an environment where employees are more likely to prioritise outcomes over appearances. When employees are empowered to pursue meaningful work, the need for fauxductivity diminishes.

Dwivedi adds, “Leaders who model the behaviour they wish to see—such as focusing on real results and not just visible busyness—can significantly reduce the pressure on employees to create an illusion of productivity.”

Breaking the fauxductivity cycle

For employees trapped in the fauxductivity cycle, the path to authenticity and meaningful work starts with self-awareness. Varma recommends a simple but powerful strategy: “Self-awareness is key to success. Understanding where you need to improve is the first step towards meaningful change.” This can be achieved through feedback from peers, reflecting on one’s work ethic, and embracing mindfulness to reduce distractions.

Varma also advises setting boundaries. “Time-blocking for uninterrupted focus, saying ‘no’ to non-essential meetings, and reducing digital distractions are all effective strategies for breaking the fauxductivity cycle.”

For managers, creating protected time for deep work and fostering a culture that values thoughtful reflection over constant action is essential. “The most important skill is time management,” says Dwivedi. “Employees must learn to manage their time effectively, and managers must recognise the importance of giving employees the space to innovate and think deeply.”

Ultimately, the shift from fauxductivity to genuine productivity requires a cultural overhaul—one that prioritises quality over quantity, autonomy over micromanagement, and creativity over constant busyness. In this environment, both employees and organisations can thrive, and the illusion of productivity can be replaced with real, impactful work.

Lead image: IMDB

Also read: When fame fades, what's left?

Also read: The power of connection: How to network with purpose and poise